Had your own real life been struck by the tragedy of a murdered loved-one, do you think you could still have written about these subjects without the grief overcoming you? And add to that the thought of marketing the deepest sadness known to man... as entertainment? My personal history is a minuscule market-share, I of course realize. Yet I admit I can't look at the covers without a wrenching pain in my heart. perhaps your response can change that...
I have given this a good bit of thought and, to be honest, I don't know whether I can change that. I don't know that I can answer that question in a way that will satisfy either of us, but I'm going to try. So I will start with the easy part. Perhaps if I start with the pat answer, I can find my way to an answer that is as honest and personal as the question.
Nine of the 25 top-rated broadcast television shows last week, in terms of total viewership, were mysteries or detective shows, starting with NCIS at number 1. Nine of the top ten hardcover fiction bestsellers on the NY Times best seller list last week were crime fiction of one sort or another, with murder at the center of the plot, starting with Kill Shot at number 1. So the pat answer is that millions of people find entertainment value by reading and watching murder mysteries, crime fiction, thrillers and suspense. But that, of course, doesn't answer the question.
Most mystery writers will tell you that their stories are about the triumph of justice, that the mystery is solved, the bad guy is caught and punished, that good triumphs over evil. And that's true, as far as it goes. People enjoy the puzzle; they enjoy the challenge of solving the crime before the fictional detective. Perhaps people also like taking a vicarious walk down a dark alley on the wrong side of the tracks. I don't know.
For me, as a writer, the dead body is not the story, the dead body is the way to gain access to a story about the living, a story that I would want to tell whether or not there was a dead body. I have said elsewhere that at some point in the series, I'm going to send my publisher a book in which no one dies, in which there is no mystery to solve. Because the story that I'm telling is Cassie's story and I can tell her story whether or not someone is murdered.
But the truth is I'm a mystery writer and I'm proud to be a mystery writer. The books are amateur sleuth mysteries. They are marketed as mysteries. They are sold as mysteries.
But I still haven't answered the question.
Had your own real life been struck by the tragedy of a murdered loved-one, do you think you could still have written about these subjects without the grief overcoming you?
Yes. I think I could have written them. But I'm not sure I could read them.
I'm a writer. It's what I do. It's how I process the events in my life. I write them down. I consider myself fortunate indeed that I have not had to face such a tragedy. But I have faced other tragedies, large and small. As have we all. And they find their way into my storytelling.
One of my favorite quotes comes from a Hasidic parable that Elie Wiesel uses as a preface of sorts to his book, The Gates of the Forest.
When the great Rabbi Israel Baal Shem-Tov saw misfortune threatening the Jews it was his custom to go into a certain part of the forest to meditate. There he would light a fire, say a special prayer, and the miracle would be accomplished and the misfortune averted.
Later, when his disciple, the celebrated Magid of Mezritch, had occasion, for the same reason, to intercede with heaven, he would go to the same place in the forest and say: "Master of the Universe, listen! I do not know how to light the fire, but I am still able to say the prayer," and again the miracle would be accomplished.
Still later, Rabbi Moshe-Leib of Sasov, in order to save his people once more, would go into the forest and say: "I do not know how to light the fire, I do not know the prayer, but I know the place and this must be sufficient." It was sufficient and the miracle was accomplished.
Then it fell to Rabbi Israel of Rizhyn to overcome misfortune. Sitting in his armchair, his head in his hands, he spoke to God: "I am unable to light the fire and I do not know the prayer; I cannot even find the place in the forest. All I can do is to tell the story, and this must be sufficient." And it was sufficient.
God made man because he loves stories.
I think it was Salmon Rushdie who referred to man as "the storytelling animal". I would suggest that all of human experience is processed in our stories. I began with a pat answer and perhaps, at the end, that is still all I have. Millions of people find entertainment value by reading and watching murder mysteries, crime fiction, thrillers and suspense. But you are not millions of people. You are one person and you bring your own life experience with you. I am sorry for your pain. I wish I had a better answer.
All I can do is tell the story, and this must be sufficient.













